<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>wally's blog &#187; xhtml</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matt.matzi.org.uk/tag/xhtml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matt.matzi.org.uk</link>
	<description>Delving deep into the mind of me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:48:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-beta1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Web standards</title>
		<link>http://matt.matzi.org.uk/2007/12/24/web-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://matt.matzi.org.uk/2007/12/24/web-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xhtml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matzi.org.uk/matt/2007/12/24/web-standards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just been having a long old tinker with plfc.org.uk, and I read on (slashdot iirc) about the upcoming HTML and XHTML releases, and the different directions they&#8217;re aiming. For once I feel that the Internet might be becoming slightly structured!  I&#8217;m in preference of XHTML, it&#8217;s well structured, it&#8217;s unambiguous (assuming people actually validate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just been having a long old tinker with plfc.org.uk, and I read on (slashdot iirc) about the upcoming HTML and XHTML releases, and the different directions they&#8217;re aiming.</p>
<p>For once I feel that the Internet might be becoming slightly structured!  I&#8217;m in preference of XHTML, it&#8217;s well structured, it&#8217;s unambiguous (<span style="font-style: italic;">assuming</span> people actually validate it, but then there&#8217;s absolutely <span style="font-weight: bold;">no</span> point in using a language if you&#8217;ve not used the correct syntax, nobody releases source code with 20 compile errors in it on the basis that &#8220;well, some compiler out there will be able to guess what I meant&#8221;), and it&#8217;s extensible.</p>
<p>That was it really.  I just thought I&#8217;d proclaim my adoration of XML <img src='http://matt.matzi.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p style="text-align: right; font-size: 8px">Blogged with <a title="Flock" href="http://www.flock.com/blogged-with-flock" target="_new">Flock</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://matt.matzi.org.uk/2007/12/24/web-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
