<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>wally's blog &#187; standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matt.matzi.org.uk/tag/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matt.matzi.org.uk</link>
	<description>Delving deep into the mind of me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Web standards</title>
		<link>http://matt.matzi.org.uk/2007/12/24/web-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://matt.matzi.org.uk/2007/12/24/web-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xhtml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matzi.org.uk/matt/2007/12/24/web-standards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just been having a long old tinker with plfc.org.uk, and I read on (slashdot iirc) about the upcoming HTML and XHTML releases, and the different directions they&#8217;re aiming. For once I feel that the Internet might be becoming slightly structured!  I&#8217;m in preference of XHTML, it&#8217;s well structured, it&#8217;s unambiguous (assuming people actually validate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just been having a long old tinker with plfc.org.uk, and I read on (slashdot iirc) about the upcoming HTML and XHTML releases, and the different directions they&#8217;re aiming.</p>
<p>For once I feel that the Internet might be becoming slightly structured!  I&#8217;m in preference of XHTML, it&#8217;s well structured, it&#8217;s unambiguous (<span style="font-style: italic;">assuming</span> people actually validate it, but then there&#8217;s absolutely <span style="font-weight: bold;">no</span> point in using a language if you&#8217;ve not used the correct syntax, nobody releases source code with 20 compile errors in it on the basis that &#8220;well, some compiler out there will be able to guess what I meant&#8221;), and it&#8217;s extensible.</p>
<p>That was it really.  I just thought I&#8217;d proclaim my adoration of XML <img src='http://matt.matzi.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p style="text-align: right; font-size: 8px">Blogged with <a title="Flock" href="http://www.flock.com/blogged-with-flock" target="_new">Flock</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://matt.matzi.org.uk/2007/12/24/web-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE7 glitches galore</title>
		<link>http://matt.matzi.org.uk/2007/08/22/ie7-glitches-galore/</link>
		<comments>http://matt.matzi.org.uk/2007/08/22/ie7-glitches-galore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matzi.org.uk/matt/2007/08/22/ie7-glitches-galore/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For anyone who claims that IE7 is &#8220;the best browser there is&#8221; (Davey&#8230;), this might just put it in a different light. Goto http://www.plfc.org.uk/ and look at the first link on the page, &#8220;FIEC&#8221;. Notice (in IE7) that there&#8217;s a little gap after it, like there&#8217;s a . Well, look at it in FireFox, Opera, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone who claims that IE7 is &#8220;the best browser there is&#8221; (Davey&#8230;), this might just put it in a different light.</p>
<p>Goto <a href="http://www.plfc.org.uk/">http://www.plfc.org.uk/</a> and look at the first link on the page, &#8220;FIEC&#8221;.  Notice (in IE7) that there&#8217;s a little gap after it, like there&#8217;s a  .  Well, look at it in FireFox, Opera, Konqueror or Safari and you&#8217;ll see a (correctly rendered) image indicating an external link (as used on Wikipedia).  Now look (in IE7) on the Missionary Support page and you&#8217;ll see what it <span style="font-style: italic;">should</span> look like on the home page.  The CSS is completely valid (I set a padding-right and a background-image, it&#8217;s the same CSS behind both pages), yet IE7 insists on not displaying the image on the home page.  Why?  Because it&#8217;s full of bugs.  Is FireFox? Yes.  But they get fixed quickly and regularly.  IE7?  Every webmaster has to just hack their way around them.</p>
<p>Go, go now and download <a href="http://www.getfirefox.com/">FireFox</a>.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Update:</span> I just had a look on IE5, and the links render <span style="font-style: italic;">completely</span> wrong.  However the home page one does work.  Interesting.  I then had a look at wikipedia to see how they get around these problems, and I noticed that in IE5 the links don&#8217;t render the external icon <span style="font-style: italic;">at all</span>.  A quick baz at the source, and I notice they have a bunch of IF statements in the HTML, each one referring various IE versions to alternative CSS &#8220;fixes&#8221;.  Seems a good idea, so I&#8217;ll ditto it.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re too lazy to go find the HTML yourself, wikipedia uses this:</p>
<pre><code> &lt;!--[if lt IE 5.5000]&gt;&lt;style type="text/css"&gt;@import "/skins-1.5/monobook/IE50Fixes.css?90";&lt;/style&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;
 &lt;!--[if IE 5.5000]&gt;&lt;style type="text/css"&gt;@import "/skins-1.5/monobook/IE55Fixes.css?90";&lt;/style&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;
 &lt;!--[if IE 6]&gt;&lt;style type="text/css"&gt;@import "/skins-1.5/monobook/IE60Fixes.css?90";&lt;/style&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;
 &lt;!--[if IE 7]&gt;&lt;style type="text/css"&gt;@import "/skins-1.5/monobook/IE70Fixes.css?90";&lt;/style&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;
 &lt;!--[if lt IE 7]&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript" src="/skins-1.5/common/IEFixes.js?90"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
 &lt;meta http-equiv="imagetoolbar" content="no" /&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;</code></pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://matt.matzi.org.uk/2007/08/22/ie7-glitches-galore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

